Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field
Bulova's timepiece meets Citizen's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) and Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic engineering while the Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field focuses on Japanese Movement craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 | Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 43mm |
| Movement | Automatic, 21 Jewels | Eco-Drive Solar |
| Caliber Type | Self-Winding Automatic | Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz |
| Power Reserve | — | — |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Domed Crystal | Spherical Mineral Crystal |
| Case Material | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Japanese Movement | Japanese Movement |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Citizen's approach
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field offers Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel construction at 43mm with Spherical Mineral Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Eco-Drive Solar
The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field uses the Eco-Drive Solar (Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz, standard reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Spherical Mineral Crystal and a standard reserve on the Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field handles 100m (10 ATM). The Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Classic Automatic 98A139
Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCitizen
Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field
Choose the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field if you value Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz technology, Japanese Movement heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Eco-Drive Solar with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Citizen delivers Japanese Movement engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Citizen's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $250–$500
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.