Updated
Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Bulova's timepiece meets Orient's diver
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) and Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic engineering while the Mako 40 Green focuses on Made in Japan craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic, 21 Jewels | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | Self-Winding Automatic | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | — | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Domed Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Japanese Movement | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Orient's approach
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Classic Automatic 98A139
Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.