Head-to-Head Comparison

Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Bulova's timepiece meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) and Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic engineering while the Mako 40 Green focuses on Made in Japan craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139

Bulova

Classic Automatic 98A139

$250–$500

Orient Mako 40 Green

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Specifications Compared

FeatureBulova Classic Automatic 98A139Orient Mako 40 Green
Price$250–$500$250–$500
Case Size45mm40mm
MovementAutomatic, 21 JewelsAutomatic Caliber F6722
Caliber TypeSelf-Winding AutomaticOrient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve40 Hours
Water Resistance30m (3 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalDomed CrystalSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialBlack Ion-Plated Stainless SteelStainless Steel
OriginJapanese MovementMade in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Bulova's design language vs Orient's approach

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Orient

45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

30m (3 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Bulova

Classic Automatic 98A139

Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) offers Automatic, 21 Jewels with reliable power reserve, while the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) features Automatic Caliber F6722 with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Japanese Movement craftsmanship vs Made in Japan engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic technology while the Mako 40 Green prioritizes Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Classic Automatic 98A139 at 45mm with 30m (3 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal while the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.