Updated
Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001
Bulova's timepiece meets Seiko's GMT watch
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500) and Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001 ($250–$500) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Classic Automatic 98A139 emphasizes Self-Winding Automatic engineering while the 5 Sports GMT SSK001 focuses on Made in Japan craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 | Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 42.5mm |
| Movement | Automatic, 21 Jewels | Automatic Caliber 4R34 (True GMT) |
| Caliber Type | Self-Winding Automatic | Seiko In-House Automatic GMT |
| Power Reserve | — | 41 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Domed Crystal | Hardlex Crystal |
| Case Material | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Japanese Movement | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001 offers Stainless Steel construction at 42.5mm with Hardlex Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Automatic Caliber 4R34 (True GMT)
The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The 5 Sports GMT SSK001 uses the Automatic Caliber 4R34 (True GMT) (Seiko In-House Automatic GMT, 41 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The 5 Sports GMT SSK001 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 42.5mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the 5 Sports GMT SSK001 at 42.5mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001 at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Hardlex Crystal and 41 Hours on the 5 Sports GMT SSK001. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the 5 Sports GMT SSK001 handles 100m (10 ATM). The 5 Sports GMT SSK001 offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Classic Automatic 98A139
Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
5 Sports GMT SSK001
Choose the Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001 if you value Seiko In-House Automatic GMT technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 42.5mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber 4R34 (True GMT) with 41 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Seiko delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko 5 Sports GMT SSK001
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's GMT watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $250–$500
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.