Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 vs Timex Weekender Chronograph
Bulova's timepiece meets Timex's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Timex Weekender Chronograph ($50–$100) delivers Quartz Chronograph (Battery) technology in the tier below the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 ($250–$500). The Weekender Chronograph measures 40mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Classic Automatic 98A139 justifies its premium with Japanese Movement heritage and Automatic, 21 Jewels. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 | Timex Weekender Chronograph |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic, 21 Jewels | Quartz Chronograph |
| Caliber Type | Self-Winding Automatic | Quartz Chronograph (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | — | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Domed Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel | Brass (Silver-Tone) |
| Origin | Japanese Movement | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Timex's approach
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 features a Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Domed Crystal protection. The Timex Weekender Chronograph offers Brass (Silver-Tone) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic, 21 Jewels vs Quartz Chronograph
The Classic Automatic 98A139 runs the Automatic, 21 Jewels (Self-Winding Automatic, standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Weekender Chronograph uses the Quartz Chronograph (Quartz Chronograph (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Classic Automatic 98A139 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Weekender Chronograph at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 sits at $250–$500 and the Timex Weekender Chronograph at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Automatic 98A139 uses Domed Crystal with a standard reserve, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Weekender Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Classic Automatic 98A139 is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Weekender Chronograph handles 30m (3 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Classic Automatic 98A139
Choose the Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 if you prioritize Self-Winding Automatic engineering, Japanese Movement craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic, 21 Jewels with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Weekender Chronograph
Choose the Timex Weekender Chronograph if you value Quartz Chronograph (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Chronograph with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139 and Timex Weekender Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Japanese Movement tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's timepiece
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Weekender Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $50–$100
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Classic Automatic 98A139
Two timepieces compared — $500–$1,000 vs $250–$500
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.