Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Bulova's diver meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 ($500–$1,000). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Movement) heritage and Automatic Miyota 8215. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 41mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Miyota 8215 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Miyota Automatic | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 42 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Movement) | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Timex's approach
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 features a Stainless Steel case at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Miyota 8215 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 runs the Automatic Miyota 8215 (Miyota Automatic, 42 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 41mm, the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 uses Sapphire Crystal with 42 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Choose the Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 if you prioritize Miyota Automatic engineering, Made in Japan (Movement) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Miyota 8215 with 42 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350 and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Movement) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Bulova's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Bulova Devil Diver Oceanographer 96B350
Tissot's timepiece meets Bulova's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.