Casio Duro MDV106 vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Casio's diver meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Duro MDV106 emphasizes Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" focuses on Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Duro MDV106 | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 2784 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 3-Year Battery | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) Diver | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Timex's approach
The Casio Duro MDV106 features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 2784 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The Duro MDV106 runs the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Duro MDV106 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 44mm, the Duro MDV106 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Casio Duro MDV106 sits at $50–$100 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Duro MDV106 uses Mineral Glass with 3-Year Battery, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Duro MDV106 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) Diver while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Duro MDV106 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) Diver water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Duro MDV106 and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.