Casio Duro MDV106 vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Casio's diver meets Bulova's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The Duro MDV106 measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph counters with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Duro MDV106 | Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 45mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 2784 | High-Performance 262kHz Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | High-Performance Quartz |
| Power Reserve | 3-Year Battery | N/A (Quartz) |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) Diver | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Made in Japan (Citizen Group) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Bulova's approach
The Casio Duro MDV106 features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph offers Stainless Steel construction at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 2784 vs High-Performance 262kHz Quartz
The Duro MDV106 runs the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz). The Duro MDV106 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44mm vs 45mm — different wrist presence
At 44mm, the Duro MDV106 wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Duro MDV106 sits at $50–$100 and the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Duro MDV106 uses Mineral Glass with 3-Year Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and N/A (Quartz) on the Lunar Pilot Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Duro MDV106 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) Diver while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph handles 50m (5 ATM). The Duro MDV106 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) Diver water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonBulova
Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you value High-Performance Quartz technology, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage, and 45mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Duro MDV106 and Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Bulova delivers Made in Japan (Citizen Group) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.