Casio Duro MDV106 vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Two divers compared — $50–$100 vs $250–$500
Quick Verdict
The Casio Duro MDV106 ($50–$100) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The Duro MDV106 measures 44mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM) Diver. The Mako 40 Green counters with Made in Japan craftsmanship and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Duro MDV106 | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 44mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 2784 | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | 3-Year Battery | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) Diver | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Orient's approach
The Casio Duro MDV106 features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 2784 vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The Duro MDV106 runs the Quartz Module 2784 (Casio Quartz (Battery), 3-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
44mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 44mm, the Duro MDV106 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Duro MDV106 sits at $50–$100 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Duro MDV106 uses Mineral Glass with 3-Year Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) Diver vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Duro MDV106 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) Diver while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Casio
Duro MDV106
Choose the Casio Duro MDV106 if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) Diver water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz Module 2784 with 3-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Duro MDV106 and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.