Casio F-91W vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Casio's timepiece meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio F-91W (Under $50) and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The F-91W emphasizes Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" focuses on Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio F-91W | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 35mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 593 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 7-Year Battery | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 30m (Splash Resistant) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Acrylic | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Resin | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Timex's approach
The Casio F-91W features a Resin case at 35mm with Acrylic protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 593 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The F-91W runs the Quartz Module 593 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 7-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The F-91W edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
35mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 35mm, the F-91W wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (Splash Resistant) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Casio F-91W sits at Under $50 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the F-91W uses Acrylic with 7-Year Battery, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (Splash Resistant) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The F-91W is rated to 30m (Splash Resistant) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
F-91W
Choose the Casio F-91W if you prioritize Casio Digital Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 30m (Splash Resistant) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 593 with 7-Year Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio F-91W and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.