Updated
Casio MRW-230H vs Timex Q Timex Reissue
Casio's timepiece meets Timex's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Timex Q Timex Reissue ($100–$150). The MRW-230H measures 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Q Timex Reissue counters with Assembled in Philippines craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MRW-230H | Timex Q Timex Reissue |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $100–$150 |
| Case Size | 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) | 38mm |
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Timex Quartz |
| Power Reserve | Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) | — |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Resin Glass | Acrylic Crystal |
| Case Material | Resin case, aluminum bezel ring | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Assembled in Philippines |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Timex's approach
The Casio MRW-230H features a Resin case, aluminum bezel ring case at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass protection. The Timex Q Timex Reissue offers Stainless Steel construction at 38mm with Acrylic Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz vs Quartz
The MRW-230H runs the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Q Timex Reissue uses the Quartz (Timex Quartz, standard reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) vs 38mm — different wrist presence
At 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm), the MRW-230H has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Q Timex Reissue at 38mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio MRW-230H sits at Under $50 and the Timex Q Timex Reissue at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the MRW-230H uses Resin Glass with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW), against Acrylic Crystal and a standard reserve on the Q Timex Reissue. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The MRW-230H is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Q Timex Reissue handles 50m (5 ATM). The MRW-230H is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
MRW-230H
Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Q Timex Reissue
Choose the Timex Q Timex Reissue if you value Timex Quartz technology, Assembled in Philippines heritage, and 38mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio MRW-230H and Timex Q Timex Reissue represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Timex delivers Assembled in Philippines engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

