Updated
Casio MRW-230H vs Timex Weekender Chronograph
Casio's timepiece meets Timex's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Casio MRW-230H (Under $50) and Timex Weekender Chronograph ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The MRW-230H emphasizes Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering while the Weekender Chronograph focuses on Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MRW-230H | Timex Weekender Chronograph |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz | Quartz Chronograph |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Quartz Chronograph (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Resin Glass | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Resin case, aluminum bezel ring | Brass (Silver-Tone) |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Timex's approach
The Casio MRW-230H features a Resin case, aluminum bezel ring case at 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) with Resin Glass protection. The Timex Weekender Chronograph offers Brass (Silver-Tone) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz vs Quartz Chronograph
The MRW-230H runs the Quartz (Casio Quartz (Battery), Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Weekender Chronograph uses the Quartz Chronograph (Quartz Chronograph (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm) vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 44.6mm (47.9 x 44.6 x 12.3mm), the MRW-230H has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Weekender Chronograph at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Casio MRW-230H sits at Under $50 and the Timex Weekender Chronograph at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the MRW-230H uses Resin Glass with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW), against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Weekender Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The MRW-230H is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Weekender Chronograph handles 30m (3 ATM). The MRW-230H is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Casio
MRW-230H
Choose the Casio MRW-230H if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz with Approx. 3-year battery (SR626SW) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Weekender Chronograph
Choose the Timex Weekender Chronograph if you value Quartz Chronograph (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Chronograph with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
View the dossierThe Bottom Line
The Casio MRW-230H and Timex Weekender Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.