Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Two field watchs compared — $100–$150 vs $50–$100

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The MTP-S120L Solar Field justifies its premium with Casio (Japan) heritage and Solar-Powered Quartz. Both represent excellent choices in the field watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

$100–$150

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio MTP-S120L Solar FieldTimex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price$100–$150$50–$100
Case Size42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm)40mm
MovementSolar-Powered QuartzQuartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber TypeCasio Tough Solar QuartzQuartz (Battery)
Power ReserveMonths on a full solar charge; no battery replacementBattery
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalMineral CrystalMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelBrass (Gunmetal Finish)
OriginCasio (Japan)Timex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Timex's approach

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Solar-Powered Quartz vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The MTP-S120L Solar Field is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

MTP-S120L Solar Field

Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

The Bottom Line

The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to the field watch category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $100–$150), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The MTP-S120L Solar Field at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.