Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Casio's timepiece meets Timex's field watch

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 ($150–$250). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Pro Trek PRG270-1 justifies its premium with Casio (Japan) heritage and Tough Solar (Solar Quartz). Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

CasioPro Trek PRG270-1$150–$250 Check price View the dossier

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio

Pro Trek PRG270-1

$150–$250

Check Price Full Review

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

View the dossier Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1	Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price	$150–$250	$50–$100
Case Size	54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm	40mm
Movement	Tough Solar (Solar Quartz)	Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber Type	Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change)	Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve	Tough Solar (Rechargeable)	Battery
Water Resistance	100m (10 ATM)	50m (5 ATM)
Crystal	Mineral Glass	Mineral Glass
Case Material	Resin	Brass (Gunmetal Finish)
Origin	Casio (Japan)	Timex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Timex's approach

The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 features a Resin case at 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The Pro Trek PRG270-1 runs the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) (Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change), Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm, the Pro Trek PRG270-1 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 sits at $150–$250 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Trek PRG270-1 uses Mineral Glass with Tough Solar (Rechargeable), against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Pro Trek PRG270-1 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Pro Trek PRG270-1 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

Pro Trek PRG270-1

Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 if you prioritize Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $150–$250, it delivers Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $150–$250), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Pro Trek PRG270-1 at 54.6 × 52.4 × 15mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. Both use Mineral Glass.

More Comparisons

Casio Duro vs Timex Expedition Scout

A budget dive watch against a budget field watch

Citizen Garrison vs Timex Expedition Scout

The two default cheap field watches

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Casio's timepiece

Explore These Watches

Casio Pro Trek PRG270-1 — Full Review Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.