Head-to-Head Comparison

Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Casio's timepiece meets Bulova's chronograph

Quick Verdict

The Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 ($250–$500) offers Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) precision in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The Pro Trek PRG601-1 measures 51.6mm and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph counters with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1

Casio

Pro Trek PRG601-1

$250–$500

Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

$500–$1,000

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Pro Trek PRG601-1Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Price$250–$500$500–$1,000
Case Size51.6mm45mm
MovementTough Solar (Solar Quartz)High-Performance 262kHz Quartz
Caliber TypeTough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change)High-Performance Quartz
Power Reserve7 Months (Solar, Full Charge); 25 Months Power SaveN/A (Quartz)
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialBio-Based Resin / Stainless SteelStainless Steel
OriginCasio (Japan)Made in Japan (Citizen Group)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Bulova's approach

The Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 features a Bio-Based Resin / Stainless Steel case at 51.6mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph offers Stainless Steel construction at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Casio

Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) vs High-Performance 262kHz Quartz

The Pro Trek PRG601-1 runs the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) (Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change), 7 Months (Solar, Full Charge); 25 Months Power Save power reserve) at standard frequency. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz). The Pro Trek PRG601-1 edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Bulova

51.6mm vs 45mm — different wrist presence

At 51.6mm, the Pro Trek PRG601-1 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Casio

Casio sits in the lower tier

The Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 sits at $250–$500 and the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Trek PRG601-1 uses Mineral Glass with 7 Months (Solar, Full Charge); 25 Months Power Save, against Sapphire Crystal and N/A (Quartz) on the Lunar Pilot Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Casio

100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Pro Trek PRG601-1 is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph handles 50m (5 ATM). The Pro Trek PRG601-1 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Casio

Pro Trek PRG601-1

Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 if you prioritize Tough Solar Quartz (No Battery Change) engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) with 7 Months (Solar, Full Charge); 25 Months Power Save power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you value High-Performance Quartz technology, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage, and 45mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 and Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Bulova delivers Made in Japan (Citizen Group) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 ($250–$500) offers Tough Solar (Solar Quartz) with 7 Months (Solar, Full Charge); 25 Months Power Save power reserve, while the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000) features High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Casio (Japan) craftsmanship vs Made in Japan (Citizen Group) engineering.
The Casio Pro Trek PRG601-1 offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $250–$500. However, the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Pro Trek PRG601-1 at 51.6mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The Pro Trek PRG601-1 uses Mineral Glass while the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.