Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Two divers compared — $250–$500 vs $250–$500

Quick Verdict

The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 ($250–$500) and Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) are closely matched divers at similar price points. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 emphasizes Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 engineering while the Mako 40 Green focuses on Made in Japan craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

Casio

Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

$250–$500

Orient Mako 40 Green

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Specifications Compared

FeatureCasio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7Orient Mako 40 Green
Price$250–$500$250–$500
Case Size56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm40mm
MovementTough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-ControlledAutomatic Caliber F6722
Caliber TypeTough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power ReserveTough Solar (Rechargeable)40 Hours
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)200m (20 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialResin / Stainless Steel, Titanium BraceletStainless Steel
OriginCasio (Japan)Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Casio's design language vs Orient's approach

The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 features a Resin / Stainless Steel, Titanium Bracelet case at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 runs the Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled (Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6, Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve) at standard frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Orient

56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm, the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 sits at $250–$500 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 uses Mineral Glass with Tough Solar (Rechargeable), against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

200m (20 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Casio

Pro Trek PRW3500T-7

Choose the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 if you prioritize Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Tough Solar (Solar Quartz), Radio-Controlled with Tough Solar (Rechargeable) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Orient Mako 40 Green is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Casio Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 is the better buy if you want solar power and quartz accuracy with no servicing. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 emphasizes Tough Solar Quartz, Multi-Band 6 technology while the Mako 40 Green prioritizes Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 at 56.9 × 53.4 × 14.8mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Pro Trek PRW3500T-7 uses Mineral Glass while the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.