Casio Vintage A168WA vs Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field
Casio's chronograph meets Citizen's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field ($250–$500). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field counters with Japanese Movement craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 43mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Eco-Drive Solar |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz |
| Power Reserve | — | — |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Spherical Mineral Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Japanese Movement |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Citizen's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field offers Black Ion-Plated Stainless Steel construction at 43mm with Spherical Mineral Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Eco-Drive Solar
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field uses the Eco-Drive Solar (Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz, standard reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 43mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field at 43mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Spherical Mineral Crystal and a standard reserve on the Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field handles 100m (10 ATM). The Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonCitizen
Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field
Choose the Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field if you value Citizen Eco-Drive Solar Quartz technology, Japanese Movement heritage, and 43mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Eco-Drive Solar with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Citizen delivers Japanese Movement engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Citizen Eco-Drive Weekender Avion Field
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Citizen's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.