Casio Vintage A168WA vs Timex Q Timex Reissue
Casio's chronograph meets Timex's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Timex Q Timex Reissue ($100–$150). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Q Timex Reissue counters with Assembled in Philippines craftsmanship and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Timex Q Timex Reissue |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $100–$150 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 38mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Timex Quartz |
| Power Reserve | — | — |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Acrylic Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Assembled in Philippines |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Timex's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Timex Q Timex Reissue offers Stainless Steel construction at 38mm with Acrylic Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Quartz
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Q Timex Reissue uses the Quartz (Timex Quartz, standard reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 38mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Q Timex Reissue at 38mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Timex Q Timex Reissue at $100–$150. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Acrylic Crystal and a standard reserve on the Q Timex Reissue. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Q Timex Reissue handles 50m (5 ATM). The Q Timex Reissue offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Q Timex Reissue
Choose the Timex Q Timex Reissue if you value Timex Quartz technology, Assembled in Philippines heritage, and 38mm proportions. At $100–$150, the Quartz with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Timex Q Timex Reissue represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Assembled in Philippines engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

