Casio Vintage A168WA vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Casio's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Vintage A168WA emphasizes Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" focuses on Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | — | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Timex's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.