Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Casio's design language vs Timex's approach

The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square features a Resin case at 42.8mm (Square) with Mineral Glass protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

Quartz Module 3229 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The G-Shock DW-5600 Square runs the Quartz Module 3229 (Casio Digital Quartz (Battery), 2-Year Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The G-Shock DW-5600 Square edges ahead on power reserve.

42.8mm (Square) vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 42.8mm (Square), the G-Shock DW-5600 Square has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

Same tier — different value propositions

The Casio G-Shock DW-5600 Square sits at $50–$100 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the G-Shock DW-5600 Square uses Mineral Glass with 2-Year Battery, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The G-Shock DW-5600 Square is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The G-Shock DW-5600 Square is better suited for water activities.