Invicta Pro Diver Automatic vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Invicta's diver meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic ($50–$100) and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Pro Diver Automatic emphasizes Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" focuses on Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Invicta Pro Diver Automatic | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Seiko NH35 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 41 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Invicta's design language vs Timex's approach
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Seiko NH35 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The Pro Diver Automatic runs the Automatic Seiko NH35 (Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 41 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Pro Diver Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Pro Diver Automatic is similarly sized compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic sits at $50–$100 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Diver Automatic uses Mineral Glass with 41 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Pro Diver Automatic is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Pro Diver Automatic is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Invicta
Pro Diver Automatic
Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic if you prioritize Seiko NH35 Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Automatic Seiko NH35 with 41 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Invicta bringing Japanese Movement (Seiko NH35) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Invicta Pro Diver Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Invicta's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Invicta Pro Diver Automatic
Tissot's timepiece meets Invicta's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.