Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Junghans Form A Automatic vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Junghans's dress watch meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) delivers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology in the tier below the Junghans Form A Automatic ($1,000–$1,500). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Form A Automatic justifies its premium with Made in Germany heritage and Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2). Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

View the dossier OrientMako 40 Green$250–$500 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Junghans

Form A Automatic

$1,000–$1,500

View the dossier Full Review

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Junghans Form A Automatic	Orient Mako 40 Green
Price	$1,000–$1,500	$250–$500
Case Size	39.3mm	40mm
Movement	Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2)	Automatic Caliber F6722
Caliber Type	Swiss ETA Base, German-Finished	Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve	38 Hours	40 Hours
Water Resistance	50m (5 ATM)	200m (20 ATM)
Crystal	Flat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating	Sapphire Crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel	Stainless Steel
Origin	Made in Germany	Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Junghans's design language vs Orient's approach

The Junghans Form A Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 39.3mm with Flat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2) vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The Form A Automatic runs the Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2) (Swiss ETA Base, German-Finished, 38 Hours power reserve) at 28,800 vph (4 Hz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Junghans

39.3mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 39.3mm, the Form A Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Orient

Orient sits in the lower tier

The Junghans Form A Automatic sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Form A Automatic uses Flat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating with 38 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Form A Automatic is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Junghans

Form A Automatic

Choose the Junghans Form A Automatic if you prioritize Swiss ETA Base, German-Finished engineering, Made in Germany craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic J800.2 (ETA 2824-2) with 38 Hours power reserve.

View the dossier

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Junghans Form A Automatic and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Junghans bringing Made in Germany tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Orient Mako 40 Green is rated 200 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Orient Mako 40 Green sits a band lower ($250–$500 against $1,000–$1,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Orient Mako 40 Green offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $250–$500. However, the Junghans Form A Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Form A Automatic at 39.3mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. The Form A Automatic uses Flat Sapphire with Anti-Reflective Coating while the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal.

More Comparisons

Hamilton Ventura vs Junghans Form A

American pop-culture icon meets German Bauhaus minimalism

Orient Kamasu vs Orient Mako 40

Orient's two sapphire 200m divers

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Junghans Form A Automatic

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Junghans's dress watch

Explore These Watches

Junghans Form A Automatic — Full Review Orient Mako 40 Green — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.