Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Two field watchs compared — $500–$1,000 vs $50–$100

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic ($500–$1,000). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Khaki Field Automatic justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic H-10. Both represent excellent choices in the field watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic

Hamilton

Khaki Field Automatic

$500–$1,000

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureHamilton Khaki Field AutomaticTimex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price$500–$1,000$50–$100
Case Size38mm40mm
MovementAutomatic H-10Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber TypeAutomatic (ETA C07.611 base)Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve80 HoursBattery
Water Resistance100m (10 ATM)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalSapphire CrystalMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelBrass (Gunmetal Finish)
OriginSwiss MadeTimex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Hamilton's design language vs Timex's approach

The Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic features a Stainless Steel case at 38mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Hamilton

Automatic H-10 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The Khaki Field Automatic runs the Automatic H-10 (Automatic (ETA C07.611 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Khaki Field Automatic edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Hamilton

38mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 38mm, the Khaki Field Automatic wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic sits at $500–$1,000 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Khaki Field Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal with 80 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Hamilton

100m (10 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Khaki Field Automatic is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Khaki Field Automatic is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Hamilton

Khaki Field Automatic

Choose the Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic if you prioritize Automatic (ETA C07.611 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic H-10 with 80 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

The Bottom Line

The Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to the field watch category — the Hamilton bringing Swiss Made tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $500–$1,000), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Khaki Field Automatic at 38mm with 100m (10 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The Khaki Field Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.