Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Bulova's chronograph meets Orient's diver
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) delivers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage and High-Performance 262kHz Quartz. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph | Orient Mako 40 Green |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $250–$500 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 40mm |
| Movement | High-Performance 262kHz Quartz | Automatic Caliber F6722 |
| Caliber Type | High-Performance Quartz | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) |
| Power Reserve | N/A (Quartz) | 40 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 200m (20 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Citizen Group) | Made in Japan |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Orient's approach
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
High-Performance 262kHz Quartz vs Automatic Caliber F6722
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph runs the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) power reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Lunar Pilot Chronograph has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph sits at $500–$1,000 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal with N/A (Quartz), against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you prioritize High-Performance Quartz engineering, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonOrient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Citizen Group) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono
Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $500–$1,000
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.