Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green

Bulova's chronograph meets Orient's diver

Quick Verdict

The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) delivers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage and High-Performance 262kHz Quartz. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

View the dossier OrientMako 40 Green$250–$500 Check price

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

$500–$1,000

View the dossier Full Review

Orient

Mako 40 Green

$250–$500

Check Price Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph	Orient Mako 40 Green
Price	$500–$1,000	$250–$500
Case Size	45mm	40mm
Movement	High-Performance 262kHz Quartz	Automatic Caliber F6722
Caliber Type	High-Performance Quartz	Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding)
Power Reserve	N/A (Quartz)	40 Hours
Water Resistance	50m (5 ATM)	200m (20 ATM)
Crystal	Sapphire Crystal	Sapphire Crystal
Case Material	Stainless Steel	Stainless Steel
Origin	Made in Japan (Citizen Group)	Made in Japan

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Bulova's design language vs Orient's approach

The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Orient Mako 40 Green offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

High-Performance 262kHz Quartz vs Automatic Caliber F6722

The Lunar Pilot Chronograph runs the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) power reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz) frequency. The Mako 40 Green uses the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Mako 40 Green offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Orient

45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 45mm, the Lunar Pilot Chronograph has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Mako 40 Green at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Orient

Orient sits in the lower tier

The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph sits at $500–$1,000 and the Orient Mako 40 Green at $250–$500. On the specs that outlast any price: the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal with N/A (Quartz), against Sapphire Crystal and 40 Hours on the Mako 40 Green. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

50m (5 ATM) vs 200m (20 ATM)

The Lunar Pilot Chronograph is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Mako 40 Green handles 200m (20 ATM). The Mako 40 Green offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you prioritize High-Performance Quartz engineering, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve.

View the dossier

Orient

Mako 40 Green

Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you value Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) technology, Made in Japan heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $250–$500, the Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph and Orient Mako 40 Green represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Citizen Group) tradition while Orient delivers Made in Japan engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Orient Mako 40 Green is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Orient Mako 40 Green is rated 200 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Orient Mako 40 Green sits a band lower ($250–$500 against $500–$1,000), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Orient Mako 40 Green offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $250–$500. However, the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Mako 40 Green at 40mm with 200m (20 ATM) is similarly capable. Both use Sapphire Crystal, which resists scratches well.

More Comparisons

Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono

Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage

Orient Kamasu vs Orient Mako 40

Orient's two sapphire 200m divers

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $500–$1,000

Explore These Watches

Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph — Full Review Orient Mako 40 Green — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.