Head-to-Head Comparison

Mido Ocean Star GMT vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Mido's diver meets Timex's field watch

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Mido Ocean Star GMT ($1,000–$1,500). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Ocean Star GMT justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661). Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Mido Ocean Star GMT

Mido

Ocean Star GMT

$1,000–$1,500

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureMido Ocean Star GMTTimex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price$1,000–$1,500$50–$100
Case Size44mm40mm
MovementAutomatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661)Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber TypeAutomatic (ETA C07.661 base)Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve80 HoursBattery
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalSapphire with Double-sided ARMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelBrass (Gunmetal Finish)
OriginSwiss MadeTimex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Mido's design language vs Timex's approach

The Mido Ocean Star GMT features a Stainless Steel case at 44mm with Sapphire with Double-sided AR protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Mido

Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The Ocean Star GMT runs the Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) (Automatic (ETA C07.661 base), 80 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Ocean Star GMT edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

44mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 44mm, the Ocean Star GMT has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Mido Ocean Star GMT sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Ocean Star GMT uses Sapphire with Double-sided AR with 80 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Mido

200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Ocean Star GMT is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Ocean Star GMT is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Mido

Ocean Star GMT

Choose the Mido Ocean Star GMT if you prioritize Automatic (ETA C07.661 base) engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) with 80 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Mido Ocean Star GMT and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Mido bringing Swiss Made tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Mido Ocean Star GMT ($1,000–$1,500) offers Automatic Caliber 80 (Base ETA C07.661) with 80 Hours power reserve, while the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) features Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Swiss Made craftsmanship vs Timex (USA Design) engineering.
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Mido Ocean Star GMT may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Ocean Star GMT at 44mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The Ocean Star GMT uses Sapphire with Double-sided AR while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.