Orient Mako 40 Green vs Rolex Datejust 41
Orient's diver meets Rolex's dress watch
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) offers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision in the tier below the Rolex Datejust 41 ($5,000–$10,000). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Datejust 41 counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Orient Mako 40 Green | Rolex Datejust 41 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $5,000–$10,000 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 41mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber F6722 | Automatic Caliber 3235 |
| Caliber Type | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day) |
| Power Reserve | 40 Hours | 70 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 100m (10 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Oystersteel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Orient's design language vs Rolex's approach
The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Rolex Datejust 41 offers Oystersteel construction at 41mm with Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Automatic Caliber 3235
The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Datejust 41 uses the Automatic Caliber 3235 (Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day), 70 Hours reserve) at standard. The Datejust 41 offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 41mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Datejust 41 at 41mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Rolex Datejust 41 at $5,000–$10,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Sapphire Crystal with Cyclops and 70 Hours on the Datejust 41. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 100m (10 ATM)
The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Datejust 41 handles 100m (10 ATM). The Mako 40 Green is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Orient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonRolex
Datejust 41
Choose the Rolex Datejust 41 if you value Rolex In-House Automatic, Superlative Chronometer (-2/+2 sec/day) technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 41mm proportions. At $5,000–$10,000, the Automatic Caliber 3235 with 70 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Orient Mako 40 Green and Rolex Datejust 41 represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Rolex delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.