Orient Mako 40 Green vs Seiko Prospex Solar Diver SNE595
Two divers compared — $250–$500 vs $500–$1,000
Quick Verdict
The Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500) offers Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) precision in the tier below the Seiko Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 ($500–$1,000). The Mako 40 Green measures 40mm and is rated 200m (20 ATM). The Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 counters with Seiko (Japan) craftsmanship and 200m Diver water resistance. Both are exceptional divers for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Orient Mako 40 Green | Seiko Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 41.0mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber F6722 | Solar Quartz |
| Caliber Type | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Seiko Solar Quartz |
| Power Reserve | 40 Hours | — |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 200m Diver |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Seiko (Japan) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Orient's design language vs Seiko's approach
The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Seiko Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 offers steel construction at 41.0mm with Sapphire. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Solar Quartz
The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 uses the Solar Quartz (Seiko Solar Quartz, standard reserve) at standard. The Mako 40 Green edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 41.0mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 at 41.0mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 200m Diver.
Value & Cost of Ownership
Orient sits in the lower tier
The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Seiko Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Sapphire and a standard reserve on the Prospex Solar Diver SNE595. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 200m Diver
The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 handles 200m Diver. Both offer identical water resistance ratings.
Our Verdict
Orient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonSeiko
Prospex Solar Diver SNE595
Choose the Seiko Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 if you value Seiko Solar Quartz technology, Seiko (Japan) heritage, and 41.0mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Solar Quartz with ample power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Orient Mako 40 Green and Seiko Prospex Solar Diver SNE595 represent two distinct approaches to the diver category — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Seiko delivers Seiko (Japan) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.