Orient Mako 40 Green vs Timex Weekender Chronograph
Orient's diver meets Timex's chronograph
Quick Verdict
The Timex Weekender Chronograph ($50–$100) delivers Quartz Chronograph (Battery) technology in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The Weekender Chronograph measures 40mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Mako 40 Green justifies its premium with Made in Japan heritage and Automatic Caliber F6722. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Orient Mako 40 Green | Timex Weekender Chronograph |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber F6722 | Quartz Chronograph |
| Caliber Type | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Quartz Chronograph (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 40 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 30m (3 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Silver-Tone) |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Orient's design language vs Timex's approach
The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Timex Weekender Chronograph offers Brass (Silver-Tone) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Quartz Chronograph
The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Weekender Chronograph uses the Quartz Chronograph (Quartz Chronograph (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Mako 40 Green edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green is similarly sized compared to the Weekender Chronograph at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Timex Weekender Chronograph at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Weekender Chronograph. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 30m (3 ATM)
The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Weekender Chronograph handles 30m (3 ATM). The Mako 40 Green is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Orient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Weekender Chronograph
Choose the Timex Weekender Chronograph if you value Quartz Chronograph (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz Chronograph with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Orient Mako 40 Green and Timex Weekender Chronograph represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.