Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Seiko's diver meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 ($500–$1,000). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 justifies its premium with Made in Japan heritage and Automatic Caliber 4R35. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 41.7mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber 4R35 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Seiko In-House Automatic | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 41 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Hardlex Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Seiko's design language vs Timex's approach
The Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 features a Stainless Steel case at 41.7mm with Hardlex Crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber 4R35 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 runs the Automatic Caliber 4R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 41 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
41.7mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 41.7mm, the Prospex Samurai SRPL13 has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 sits at $500–$1,000 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Prospex Samurai SRPL13 uses Hardlex Crystal with 41 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Prospex Samurai SRPL13 is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Seiko
Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Choose the Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 if you prioritize Seiko In-House Automatic engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers Automatic Caliber 4R35 with 41 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13 and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Seiko bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Seiko's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Seiko Prospex Samurai SRPL13
Tissot's timepiece meets Seiko's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.