Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Seiko's diver meets Timex's field watch

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation ($1,000–$1,500). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation justifies its premium with Made in Japan heritage and Automatic 6R35. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

SeikoProspex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation$1,000–$1,500 Check price View the dossier

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Seiko

Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

$1,000–$1,500

Check Price Full Review

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

View the dossier Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation	Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price	$1,000–$1,500	$50–$100
Case Size	40.5mm	40mm
Movement	Automatic 6R35	Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber Type	Seiko In-House Automatic	Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve	70 Hours	Battery
Water Resistance	200m (20 ATM)	50m (5 ATM)
Crystal	Sapphire	Mineral Glass
Case Material	Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating	Brass (Gunmetal Finish)
Origin	Made in Japan	Timex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Seiko's design language vs Timex's approach

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation features a Stainless Steel with Super-Hard Coating case at 40.5mm with Sapphire protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Seiko

Automatic 6R35 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation runs the Automatic 6R35 (Seiko In-House Automatic, 70 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

40.5mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 40.5mm, the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses Sapphire with 70 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Seiko

200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Seiko

Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation

Choose the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation if you prioritize Seiko In-House Automatic engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Automatic 6R35 with 70 Hours power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Seiko bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation is rated 200 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $1,000–$1,500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation at 40.5mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation uses Sapphire while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

More Comparisons

Oris Aquis vs Seiko SPB143 (62MAS)

Swiss independence meets Japanese precision diving

Casio Duro vs Timex Expedition Scout

A budget dive watch against a budget field watch

Citizen Garrison vs Timex Expedition Scout

The two default cheap field watches

Explore These Watches

Seiko Prospex 62MAS Modern Re-interpretation — Full Review Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.