Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated September 5, 2026

Stauer 1920s Retrograde vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Stauer's dress watch meets Timex's field watch

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Stauer 1920s Retrograde ($100–$150). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The 1920s Retrograde justifies its premium with Stauer (USA brand, imported) heritage and Quartz. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

Stauer1920s Retrograde$100–$150 Check price View the dossier

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

$100–$150

Check Price Full Review

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

View the dossier Full Review

Specifications Compared

Feature	Stauer 1920s Retrograde	Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price	$100–$150	$50–$100
Case Size	43mm	40mm
Movement	Quartz	Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber Type	Quartz	Quartz (Battery)
Power Reserve	Battery	Battery
Water Resistance	100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer	50m (5 ATM)
Crystal	Mineral crystal	Mineral Glass
Case Material	Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel)	Brass (Gunmetal Finish)
Origin	Stauer (USA brand, imported)	Timex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Stauer's design language vs Timex's approach

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde features a Gold-tone stainless steel (listing photo shows a gold-tone finish; Amazon spec table says stainless steel) case at 43mm with Mineral crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Quartz vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The 1920s Retrograde runs the Quartz (Quartz, Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

43mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 43mm, the 1920s Retrograde has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde sits at $100–$150 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal with Battery, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Stauer

100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer vs 50m (5 ATM)

The 1920s Retrograde is rated to 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The 1920s Retrograde is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Stauer

1920s Retrograde

Choose the Stauer 1920s Retrograde if you prioritize Quartz engineering, Stauer (USA brand, imported) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Quartz with Battery power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

Try Prime Free — Free Shipping on Both Watches Students & 18–24: start Prime for Young Adults free

The Bottom Line

The Stauer 1920s Retrograde and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Stauer bringing Stauer (USA brand, imported) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

For water, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde is rated 100 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $100–$150), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Stauer 1920s Retrograde may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.

Both are suitable for daily wear. The 1920s Retrograde at 43mm with 100m (10 ATM), as listed by Stauer water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The 1920s Retrograde uses Mineral crystal while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass.

More Comparisons

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Stauer's dress watch

Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch

Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Stauer 1920s Retrograde

Tissot's timepiece meets Stauer's dress watch

Explore These Watches

Stauer 1920s Retrograde — Full Review Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" — Full Review Browse All Guides

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.