Updated
Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Casio's field watch meets Tissot's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field ($100–$150) offers Casio Tough Solar Quartz precision in the tier below the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic ($500–$1,000). The MTP-S120L Solar Field measures 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) and is rated 100m (10 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field | Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $100–$150 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) | 40mm |
| Movement | Solar-Powered Quartz | Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Tough Solar Quartz | ETA/Tissot Automatic |
| Power Reserve | Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 100m (10 ATM) | 300m (30 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Casio (Japan) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field features a Stainless Steel case at 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) with Mineral Crystal protection. The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Solar-Powered Quartz vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
The MTP-S120L Solar Field runs the Solar-Powered Quartz (Casio Tough Solar Quartz, Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve) at standard frequency. The Seastar 1000 Automatic uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm) vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 42mm (49 x 42 x 10.9mm), the MTP-S120L Solar Field has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Seastar 1000 Automatic at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 100m (10 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field sits at $100–$150 and the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the MTP-S120L Solar Field uses Mineral Crystal with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Seastar 1000 Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
100m (10 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)
The MTP-S120L Solar Field is rated to 100m (10 ATM) while the Seastar 1000 Automatic handles 300m (30 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
MTP-S120L Solar Field
Choose the Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field if you prioritize Casio Tough Solar Quartz engineering, Casio (Japan) craftsmanship, and 100m (10 ATM) water resistance. At $100–$150, it delivers Solar-Powered Quartz with Months on a full solar charge; no battery replacement power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Seastar 1000 Automatic
Choose the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
View the dossierThe Bottom Line
The Casio MTP-S120L Solar Field and Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Casio (Japan) tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

