Casio Vintage A168WA vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Casio's chronograph meets Tissot's diver
Quick Verdict
The Casio Vintage A168WA (Under $50) offers Casio Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic ($500–$1,000). The Vintage A168WA measures 36.3mm and is rated 30m (3 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Casio Vintage A168WA | Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Under $50 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 36.3mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz Module 3298 | Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) |
| Caliber Type | Casio Quartz (Battery) | ETA/Tissot Automatic |
| Power Reserve | — | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 30m (3 ATM) | 300m (30 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel & Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Casio's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Casio Vintage A168WA features a Stainless Steel & Resin case at 36.3mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz Module 3298 vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
The Vintage A168WA runs the Quartz Module 3298 (Casio Quartz (Battery), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Seastar 1000 Automatic uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
36.3mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 36.3mm, the Vintage A168WA wears more compactly on smaller wrists compared to the Seastar 1000 Automatic at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 30m (3 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Casio sits in the lower tier
The Casio Vintage A168WA sits at Under $50 and the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Vintage A168WA uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Seastar 1000 Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
30m (3 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)
The Vintage A168WA is rated to 30m (3 ATM) while the Seastar 1000 Automatic handles 300m (30 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Casio
Vintage A168WA
Choose the Casio Vintage A168WA if you prioritize Casio Quartz (Battery) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 30m (3 ATM) water resistance. At Under $50, it delivers Quartz Module 3298 with solid power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Seastar 1000 Automatic
Choose the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Casio Vintage A168WA and Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Casio bringing Made in Japan tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs Under $50
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Tissot's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Casio Vintage A168WA
Tissot's timepiece meets Casio's chronograph
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.