Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Frederique Constant's dress watch meets Tissot's diver
Quick Verdict
The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic ($500–$1,000) delivers ETA/Tissot Automatic technology in the tier below the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase ($1,000–$1,500). The Seastar 1000 Automatic measures 40mm and is rated 300m (30 ATM). The Classic Quartz Moonphase justifies its premium with Swiss Made heritage and Quartz FC-206. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase | Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,000–$1,500 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz FC-206 | Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) |
| Caliber Type | Swiss Quartz | ETA/Tissot Automatic |
| Power Reserve | Battery | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 300m (30 ATM) |
| Crystal | Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Swiss Made | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Frederique Constant's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal protection. The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz FC-206 vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase runs the Quartz FC-206 (Swiss Quartz, Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Seastar 1000 Automatic uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Classic Quartz Moonphase is similarly sized compared to the Seastar 1000 Automatic at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Tissot sits in the lower tier
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase sits at $1,000–$1,500 and the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Classic Quartz Moonphase uses Anti-Reflective Sapphire Crystal with Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Seastar 1000 Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)
The Classic Quartz Moonphase is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Seastar 1000 Automatic handles 300m (30 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Frederique Constant
Classic Quartz Moonphase
Choose the Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase if you prioritize Swiss Quartz engineering, Swiss Made craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $1,000–$1,500, it delivers Quartz FC-206 with Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Seastar 1000 Automatic
Choose the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase and Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Frederique Constant bringing Swiss Made tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Tissot's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Frederique Constant Classic Quartz Moonphase
Tissot's timepiece meets Frederique Constant's dress watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.

