Head-to-Head Comparison

Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Invicta's diver meets Timex's field watch

Quick Verdict

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 ($50–$100) and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 emphasizes Automatic (Seiko NH35A) engineering while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" focuses on Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic 23681

$50–$100

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureInvicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price$50–$100$50–$100
Case Size40mm40mm
MovementAutomatic NH35AQuartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber TypeAutomatic (Seiko NH35A)Quartz (Battery)
Power ReserveBattery
Water Resistance200m50m (5 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassMineral Glass
Case MaterialBrass (Gunmetal Finish)
OriginInvicta (Japanese movement)Timex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Invicta's design language vs Timex's approach

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 features a steel case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

Automatic NH35A vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 runs the Automatic NH35A (Automatic (Seiko NH35A), standard power reserve) at standard frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Draw

40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is similarly sized compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Draw

Same tier — different value propositions

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 sits at $50–$100 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Pro Diver Automatic 23681 uses Mineral Glass with a standard reserve, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Invicta

200m vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is rated to 200m while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Invicta

Pro Diver Automatic 23681

Choose the Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 if you prioritize Automatic (Seiko NH35A) engineering, Invicta (Japanese movement) craftsmanship, and 200m water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Automatic NH35A with solid power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Invicta bringing Invicta (Japanese movement) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Invicta Pro Diver Automatic 23681 ($50–$100) offers Automatic NH35A with reliable power reserve, while the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) features Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Invicta (Japanese movement) craftsmanship vs Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Both are priced similarly, making this a question of preference rather than value. The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 emphasizes Automatic (Seiko NH35A) technology while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" prioritizes Quartz (Battery) precision.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Pro Diver Automatic 23681 at 40mm with 200m water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. Both use Mineral Glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.