Head-to-Head Comparison

Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Bulova's chronograph meets Timex's field watch

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Lunar Pilot Chronograph justifies its premium with Made in Japan (Citizen Group) heritage and High-Performance 262kHz Quartz. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

$500–$1,000

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureBulova Lunar Pilot ChronographTimex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price$500–$1,000$50–$100
Case Size45mm40mm
MovementHigh-Performance 262kHz QuartzQuartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber TypeHigh-Performance QuartzQuartz (Battery)
Power ReserveN/A (Quartz)Battery
Water Resistance50m (5 ATM)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalSapphire CrystalMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelBrass (Gunmetal Finish)
OriginMade in Japan (Citizen Group)Timex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Bulova's design language vs Timex's approach

The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Draw

High-Performance 262kHz Quartz vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The Lunar Pilot Chronograph runs the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) power reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. Power reserves are closely matched.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 45mm, the Lunar Pilot Chronograph has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph sits at $500–$1,000 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal with N/A (Quartz), against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Draw

50m (5 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Lunar Pilot Chronograph is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). Both offer identical water resistance ratings.

Our Verdict

Bulova

Lunar Pilot Chronograph

Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you prioritize High-Performance Quartz engineering, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve.

Check Price on Amazon

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

Check Price on Amazon

The Bottom Line

The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Citizen Group) tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Neither is objectively better — they serve different preferences. The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000) offers High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve, while the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) features Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. Choose based on your priorities: Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship vs Timex (USA Design) engineering.
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph at 45mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.