Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Orient's diver meets Timex's field watch

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver ($250–$500). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Kamasu Automatic Diver justifies its premium with Made in Japan heritage and Automatic Caliber F6922. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver

Orient

Kamasu Automatic Diver

$250–$500

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

Specifications Compared

FeatureOrient Kamasu Automatic DiverTimex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Price$250–$500$50–$100
Case Size41.8mm40mm
MovementAutomatic Caliber F6922Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
Caliber TypeOrient In-House AutomaticQuartz (Battery)
Power Reserve40 HoursBattery
Water Resistance200m (20 ATM)50m (5 ATM)
CrystalSapphire CrystalMineral Glass
Case MaterialStainless SteelBrass (Gunmetal Finish)
OriginMade in JapanTimex (USA Design)

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Orient's design language vs Timex's approach

The Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver features a Stainless Steel case at 41.8mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Orient

Automatic Caliber F6922 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)

The Kamasu Automatic Diver runs the Automatic Caliber F6922 (Orient In-House Automatic, 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Kamasu Automatic Diver edges ahead on power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Timex

41.8mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 41.8mm, the Kamasu Automatic Diver has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver sits at $250–$500 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Kamasu Automatic Diver uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Orient

200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)

The Kamasu Automatic Diver is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Kamasu Automatic Diver is better suited for water activities.

Our Verdict

Orient

Kamasu Automatic Diver

Choose the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6922 with 40 Hours power reserve.

View the dossier

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

The Bottom Line

The Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver is rated 200 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $250–$500), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Orient Kamasu Automatic Diver may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Kamasu Automatic Diver at 41.8mm with 200m (20 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) is similarly capable. The Kamasu Automatic Diver uses Sapphire Crystal while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.