Orient Mako 40 Green vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Orient's diver meets Timex's field watch
Quick Verdict
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) delivers Quartz (Battery) technology in the tier below the Orient Mako 40 Green ($250–$500). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Mako 40 Green justifies its premium with Made in Japan heritage and Automatic Caliber F6722. Both represent excellent choices in the luxury watch category.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Orient Mako 40 Green | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250–$500 | $50–$100 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Automatic Caliber F6722 | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) |
| Caliber Type | Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) | Quartz (Battery) |
| Power Reserve | 40 Hours | Battery |
| Water Resistance | 200m (20 ATM) | 50m (5 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Mineral Glass |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) |
| Origin | Made in Japan | Timex (USA Design) |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Orient's design language vs Timex's approach
The Orient Mako 40 Green features a Stainless Steel case at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers Brass (Gunmetal Finish) construction at 40mm with Mineral Glass. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Automatic Caliber F6722 vs Quartz (3-Hand, Date)
The Mako 40 Green runs the Automatic Caliber F6722 (Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding), 40 Hours power reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz) frequency. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery reserve) at standard. The Mako 40 Green edges ahead on power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Mako 40 Green is similarly sized compared to the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Orient Mako 40 Green sits at $250–$500 and the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at $50–$100. On the specs that outlast any price: the Mako 40 Green uses Sapphire Crystal with 40 Hours, against Mineral Glass and Battery on the Expedition Metal Field "Scout". Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
200m (20 ATM) vs 50m (5 ATM)
The Mako 40 Green is rated to 200m (20 ATM) while the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" handles 50m (5 ATM). The Mako 40 Green is better suited for water activities.
Our Verdict
Orient
Mako 40 Green
Choose the Orient Mako 40 Green if you prioritize Orient In-House Automatic (Hacking, Hand-Winding) engineering, Made in Japan craftsmanship, and 200m (20 ATM) water resistance. At $250–$500, it delivers Automatic Caliber F6722 with 40 Hours power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTimex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you value Quartz (Battery) technology, Timex (USA Design) heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $50–$100, the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Orient Mako 40 Green and Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Orient bringing Made in Japan tradition while Timex delivers Timex (USA Design) engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Orient's diver
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Orient Mako 40 Green
Tissot's timepiece meets Orient's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.