Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Bulova's chronograph meets Tissot's diver
Quick Verdict
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph ($500–$1,000) and Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic ($500–$1,000) are closely matched timepieces at similar price points. The Lunar Pilot Chronograph emphasizes High-Performance Quartz engineering while the Seastar 1000 Automatic focuses on Swiss Made craftsmanship.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph | Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500–$1,000 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 45mm | 40mm |
| Movement | High-Performance 262kHz Quartz | Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) |
| Caliber Type | High-Performance Quartz | ETA/Tissot Automatic |
| Power Reserve | N/A (Quartz) | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 300m (30 ATM) |
| Crystal | Sapphire Crystal | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Made in Japan (Citizen Group) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Bulova's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph features a Stainless Steel case at 45mm with Sapphire Crystal protection. The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
High-Performance 262kHz Quartz vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph runs the High-Performance 262kHz Quartz (High-Performance Quartz, N/A (Quartz) power reserve) at 262,144 Hz (High-Frequency Quartz) frequency. The Seastar 1000 Automatic uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
45mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 45mm, the Lunar Pilot Chronograph has a bolder wrist presence compared to the Seastar 1000 Automatic at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Same tier — different value propositions
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph sits at $500–$1,000 and the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Lunar Pilot Chronograph uses Sapphire Crystal with N/A (Quartz), against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Seastar 1000 Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)
The Lunar Pilot Chronograph is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Seastar 1000 Automatic handles 300m (30 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Bulova
Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Choose the Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph if you prioritize High-Performance Quartz engineering, Made in Japan (Citizen Group) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $500–$1,000, it delivers High-Performance 262kHz Quartz with N/A (Quartz) power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Seastar 1000 Automatic
Choose the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph and Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Bulova bringing Made in Japan (Citizen Group) tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Bulova Lunar Pilot vs Hamilton Intra-Matic Chrono
Moon-worn quartz precision meets Swiss automatic heritage
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Bulova Lunar Pilot Chronograph
Two chronographs compared — $2,500–$5,000 vs $500–$1,000
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Tissot's diver
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.