Head-to-Head Comparison

Updated

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic

Timex's field watch meets Tissot's diver

Quick Verdict

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) offers Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic ($500–$1,000). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.

Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.

Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

$50–$100

Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic

Tissot

Seastar 1000 Automatic

$500–$1,000

Specifications Compared

FeatureTimex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Price$50–$100$500–$1,000
Case Size40mm40mm
MovementQuartz (3-Hand, Date)Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
Caliber TypeQuartz (Battery)ETA/Tissot Automatic
Power ReserveBattery80 Hours
Water Resistance50m (5 ATM)300m (30 ATM)
CrystalMineral GlassSapphire Crystal
Case MaterialBrass (Gunmetal Finish)Stainless Steel
OriginTimex (USA Design)Swiss Made

Category-by-Category Analysis

🎨

Design & Aesthetics

Edge: Draw

Timex's design language vs Tissot's approach

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" features a Brass (Gunmetal Finish) case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.

⚙️

Movement & Performance

Edge: Tissot

Quartz (3-Hand, Date) vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)

The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" runs the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Seastar 1000 Automatic uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers a longer power reserve.

📏

Wearability & Fit

Edge: Draw

40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence

At 40mm, the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is similarly sized compared to the Seastar 1000 Automatic at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).

💰

Value & Cost of Ownership

Edge: Timex

Timex sits in the lower tier

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits at $50–$100 and the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass with Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Seastar 1000 Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.

💧

Water Resistance

Edge: Tissot

50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)

The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Seastar 1000 Automatic handles 300m (30 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers superior water resistance.

Our Verdict

Timex

Expedition Metal Field "Scout"

Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you prioritize Quartz (Battery) engineering, Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve.

View the dossier

Tissot

Seastar 1000 Automatic

Choose the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.

View the dossier

The Bottom Line

The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" and Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Timex bringing Timex (USA Design) tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic is the better buy if you want a mechanical movement; the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is the better buy if you want quartz accuracy with no servicing. For water, the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic is rated 300 m against 50 m, which is the difference between swimming and diving on one side and splashes on the other. On price, the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits a band lower ($50–$100 against $500–$1,000), so it is the cheaper way into the category. Neither is better at everything; the spec table above shows movement, case size, water resistance and crystal side by side so you can weigh what matters to you. We do not test units, so this is the makers' data, not a bench result.
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" offers better upfront value, sitting a tier lower at $50–$100. However, the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic may justify its premium with superior finishing, heritage, or resale value.
Both are suitable for daily wear. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" at 40mm with 50m (5 ATM) water resistance handles everyday situations. The Seastar 1000 Automatic at 40mm with 300m (30 ATM) is similarly capable. The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass while the Seastar 1000 Automatic uses Sapphire Crystal. Sapphire resists scratches noticeably better than mineral glass.

How This Page Was Made

Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.