Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Timex's field watch meets Tissot's diver
Quick Verdict
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" ($50–$100) offers Quartz (Battery) precision in the tier below the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic ($500–$1,000). The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" measures 40mm and is rated 50m (5 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic counters with Swiss Made craftsmanship and 300m (30 ATM) water resistance. Both are exceptional watches for their respective tiers.
Transparency — We earn a small commission on purchases made through our Amazon links. This doesn't affect our editorial independence.
Specifications Compared
| Feature | Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" | Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50–$100 | $500–$1,000 |
| Case Size | 40mm | 40mm |
| Movement | Quartz (3-Hand, Date) | Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) |
| Caliber Type | Quartz (Battery) | ETA/Tissot Automatic |
| Power Reserve | Battery | 80 Hours |
| Water Resistance | 50m (5 ATM) | 300m (30 ATM) |
| Crystal | Mineral Glass | Sapphire Crystal |
| Case Material | Brass (Gunmetal Finish) | Stainless Steel |
| Origin | Timex (USA Design) | Swiss Made |
Category-by-Category Analysis
Design & Aesthetics
Timex's design language vs Tissot's approach
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" features a Brass (Gunmetal Finish) case at 40mm with Mineral Glass protection. The Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic offers Stainless Steel construction at 40mm with Sapphire Crystal. Both represent their brand's distinct design philosophy and heritage.
Movement & Performance
Quartz (3-Hand, Date) vs Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111)
The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" runs the Quartz (3-Hand, Date) (Quartz (Battery), Battery power reserve) at standard frequency. The Seastar 1000 Automatic uses the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) (ETA/Tissot Automatic, 80 Hours reserve) at 21,600 vph (3 Hz). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers a longer power reserve.
Wearability & Fit
40mm vs 40mm — different wrist presence
At 40mm, the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is similarly sized compared to the Seastar 1000 Automatic at 40mm. Water resistance differs: 50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM).
Value & Cost of Ownership
Timex sits in the lower tier
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" sits at $50–$100 and the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic at $500–$1,000. On the specs that outlast any price: the Expedition Metal Field "Scout" uses Mineral Glass with Battery, against Sapphire Crystal and 80 Hours on the Seastar 1000 Automatic. Service intervals are typically 5-7 years for both.
Water Resistance
50m (5 ATM) vs 300m (30 ATM)
The Expedition Metal Field "Scout" is rated to 50m (5 ATM) while the Seastar 1000 Automatic handles 300m (30 ATM). The Seastar 1000 Automatic offers superior water resistance.
Our Verdict
Timex
Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Choose the Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" if you prioritize Quartz (Battery) engineering, Timex (USA Design) craftsmanship, and 50m (5 ATM) water resistance. At $50–$100, it delivers Quartz (3-Hand, Date) with Battery power reserve.
Check Price on AmazonTissot
Seastar 1000 Automatic
Choose the Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic if you value ETA/Tissot Automatic technology, Swiss Made heritage, and 40mm proportions. At $500–$1,000, the Automatic Powermatic 80 (Caliber 80.111) with 80 Hours power reserve makes it a compelling choice.
Check Price on AmazonThe Bottom Line
The Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout" and Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic represent two distinct approaches to fine watchmaking — the Timex bringing Timex (USA Design) tradition while Tissot delivers Swiss Made engineering.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Timex's field watch
Tag Heuer Carrera Chronograph vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Automatic
Tag Heuer's chronograph meets Tissot's diver
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Timex Expedition Metal Field "Scout"
Tissot's timepiece meets Timex's field watch
Explore These Watches
How This Page Was Made
Our comparisons are generated from a hand-maintained specification database and reviewed under our editorial standards. We use AI tools to assemble pages from that data. We don’t invent specs: every number traces back to the database, and when we correct an entry, the fix is applied site-wide. As an Amazon Associate, The Horologist earns from qualifying purchases.